Download 16. Republic vs Alonte PDF

Title16. Republic vs Alonte
TagsProperty Certiorari Deed Appeal Court Of Appeal Of Singapore
File Size335.0 KB
Total Pages7
Document Text Contents
Page 1

http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt1

Page 2

The following documents were presented to prove the jurisdictional facts:

● Exhibit "A" - copy of the Petition dated July 27, 2001.

● Exhibit "B" - Order dated August 29, 2001.

● Exhibit "C", "C-1" to "C-5" - the proof of service of the said Order to the City
Prosecutor's Office, the Registry of Deeds of Quezon City, the Quezon City Legal
Department, the Land Registration Authority, the Office of the Solicitor General, and the
Land Management Bureau of the DENR;

● Exhibit "D" - Certificate of Publication dated October 26, 2001 issued by the National
Printing Office;

● Exhibit "E" - Volume 97 No. 43, October 22, 2001 issue of the Official Gazette;

● Exhibit "E-1" - Volume 97 No. 44, October 29, 2001 issue of the Official Gazette;

● Exhibit "F" - Certificate of Posting and Service dated November 19, 2001 by the Deputy
Sheriff of this Court.

In addition to the abovementioned documents, the petitioner-appellee presented the
following:

● Annex "A" - Photocopy of TCT No. 335986;

● Annex "B" - Tax Declaration No. D-074-00504 for 1996;

● Annex "C" - Tax Declaration No. D-074-00921 for 1997;

● Annex "D" - Certification from the Office of the City Treasurer dated July 25, 2001;

? Annex "E" - Certification from the Register of Deeds of Quezon City dated February 4,
2000;

● Annex "F" - Affidavit of Loss dated July 9, 2001;

● Annex "G" - Technical Description;

● Annex "H" - Certification from the Office of the City Assessor dated August 1, 2001
(Records, pp. 5-12).

2


The CA further adopted the following factual findings of the RTC, to wit:

The adjoining owners of the subject property were also furnished with copies of the Order dated
August 29, 2001 by registered mail, as evidenced by the registry return cards (Exhibits "G", "G-1"

http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt2

Page 3

http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt3
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt4
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt5
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt6

Page 4

http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt7
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt8
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt9
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt10

Page 5

http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt11
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt12
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt13

Page 6

http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt14
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt15
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt16
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt17
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_162787_2008.html#fnt18

Similer Documents